Fiji’s PM Sitiveni Rabuka says the 2013 Constitution outlines the process for removing the Speaker of the House.
Rabuka posted a statement on his social media page, stating that the constitution specifies who has the authority to remove the Speaker of Parliament. He was referring to public calls made regarding comments made by Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu during a parliamentary sitting early last month.
During the September 9 parliament session, Ratu Naiqama asked MPs Aliki Bia and Assistant Minister OPM Sakiusa Tubuna whether they identify as Fijians or wish to return to the Solomons.
Ratu Naiqama made the comments during a debate following Bia’s End of the Week statement. In the statement, Bia highlighted what he perceived as mistreatment and historical injustices faced by the Melanesian community, particularly descendants of blackbirders pointing out incidents of forced relocations and unfair treatment of community leaders. Bia also questioned the effectiveness of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, fearing it may neglect the specific injustices faced by his community. He also referred to a festival scheduled to be celebrated later this year, marking 160 years since their ancestors’ arrival, stating that while it is welcomed there is a need for deeper recognition and justice beyond festivities.
Government MP Sakiusa Tubuna responded for the other side, acknowledging the concerns but attributed many issues to the 2013 Constitution, insisting it has marginalised minority groups.
Ratu Naiqama then intervened, disputing Bia’s claims, asserting that many Melanesians are integrated and registered into Fijian society as is the case in his own mataqali Valewaqa in Vunilagi in Qamea, and the Yavusa o Benau, and consequently the VKB. He recounted historical attempts to assist the community and noted that many have chosen to remain in Fiji. Ratu Naiqama then made the remarks about Bia and Tubuna’s identity, and he insisted that discussions should be grounded in factual representation.
The comments regarding the duo’s return to Solomon were not well-received, leading activists to call for Ratu Naiqama to vacate the Speaker’s seat.
Commenting on the issue, Rabuka said: “Whoever made that call should refer to their constitution to understand who has the authority to remove the Speaker of Parliament. Our parliamentary processes are guided by the constitution, and it is important that we follow the proper legal channels in addressing these matters”, stating that it is essential to uphold the rule of law and maintain the integrity of institutions.
